About Us |
PMID | 18073304 |
Gene Name | RXFP2 |
Condition | Infertility |
Association |
The results suggest that the T222P mutation cannot be considered either causative or a susceptibility factor for cryptorchidism. |
Mutation | T222P |
Population size | 822 |
Population details | 822(359 with a history of cryptorchidism ( Italian (98 unilateral, 61 bilateral), Hungarian patients (51 unilateral, 19 bilateral), Egyptian origin ( 45 unilateral, 8 bilateral), 77 Spanish patients) and 463 controls) |
Sex | Male |
Infertility type | Male infertility |
Other associated phenotypes |
Cryptorchidism |
The leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 8 gene T222P mutation does not cause cryptorchidism Nuti F, Marinari E, Erdei E, El-Hamshari M, Echavarria MG, Ars E, Balercia G, Merksz M, Giachini C, Shaeer KZ, Forti G, Ruiz-Castané E, Krausz C. CONTEXT: Insulin-like 3 and its receptor, leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 8 (LGR8), are essential for the first phase of testicular descent. Homozygous loss of either of the two genes in mice leads to cryptorchidism. Although mutations in both homologous human genes are not a common cause of cryptorchidism. To date, only one missense mutation at codon 222 (T222P) of the LGR8 gene has been proposed as a causative mutation for cryptorchidism. This conclusion was based on both functional in vitro studies and the lack of mutation in a large group of controls. The geographical origin of the mutation carriers suggested a founder effect in the Mediterranean area. OBJECTIVES: We sought to define the frequency of the T222P mutation in four different countries to assess whether the screening for this mutation could be of use as a diagnostic genetic test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 822 subjects (359 with a history of cryptorchidism and 463 controls) from Italy, Spain, Hungary, and Egypt were genotyped for the T222P mutation by direct sequencing. RESULTS: The phenotypical expression of the mutation also included normal testicular descent. The mutation frequency was not significantly different in cryptorchid patients vs. noncryptorchid controls (3.6 vs. 1.7%, respectively). No significant geographical differences were observed in mutation frequencies. The haplotype analysis allowed us to predict three distinct haplotypes, i.e. three possible mutation events. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the T222P mutation cannot be considered either causative or a susceptibility factor for cryptorchidism. A true causative mutation in the LGR8 gene still remains to be identified. FAU - Nuti, Francesca AU - Nuti F AD - Andrology Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139 Firenze, Italy. FAU - Marinari, Eliana AU - Marinari E FAU - Erdei, Edit AU - Erdei E FAU - El-Hamshari, Manal AU - El-Hamshari M FAU - Echavarria, Mirna Guadalupe AU - Echavarria MG FAU - Ars, Elisabet AU - Ars E FAU - Balercia, Giancarlo AU - Balercia G FAU - Merksz, Miklos AU - Merksz M FAU - Giachini, Claudia AU - Giachini C FAU - Shaeer, Kamal Zaki Mahmoud AU - Shaeer KZ FAU - Forti, Gianni AU - Forti G FAU - Ruiz-Castané, Eduard AU - Ruiz-Castané E |